AlbionAlbion River BridgeCalTransEnvironment & Natural ResourcesPolitics & GovernmentRoads & Transportation

After criticism, Caltrans plans a second public meeting on Albion River Bridge replacement 

MENDOCINO CO., 9/11/24 — Faced with criticism about its one overcrowded public meeting held on August 13 to discuss the Albion River Bridge replacement project, Caltrans has changed course and extended its comment period to give people another month. Caltrans is also now planning to hold a second public meeting. In an email sent Monday, September 9, Caltrans North Region Environmental Chief Liza Walker wrote the date of the second meeting is still to be determined and that the meeting will likely be virtual, although it could be a workshop-style meeting. She said that Caltrans will respond to public comments it receives in that meeting. Previously, Caltrans said there would be no second meeting.

UC Berkeley engineering professor Hassan Astaneh-Asl inspects the Albion River Bridge in 2014. Structural engineer Astaneh-Asl has since retired from teaching but is still an active critic of Caltrans’ plans. (Frank Hartzell/The Mendocino Voice)

Caltrans says the new meeting is to let the public comment on its Albion River Bridge draft Environmental Impact Report. However, that was supposedly the aim of the August 13 meeting, at which Caltrans reps made it clear that the purpose of the meeting was to offer the public the chance to evaluate the five options for bridge replacement provided in the EIR documents. The environmental documents present statements about the economic, environmental, visual, and other aspects of each of the five options. Jim Heid, of the Albion Bridge Stewards, which is advocating for the repair of the present historic bridge rather than replacement, points out that it is unusual for an agency to evaluate five different bridge models in a single environmental document. 

This double-arched bridge was one of Caltrans’ options in 2014 with its own environmental documents and much more specific information than is being offered in 2024. The double-arched bridge was modeled on the 1942 plans for a new Albion River Bridge. World War II authorities nixed those approved plans because concrete was being rationed for World War II, and the bridge was built out of recycled materials, including old-growth Douglas fir instead. (Frank Hartzell/The Mendocino Voice)

So far, none of Mendocino County’s elected representatives have weighed in on the plans. 

The public comment period for choosing one of five designs for a new bridge expired Monday, but in her email, Walker said Caltrans would extend the comment period for another 30 days, to October 9, to give people time to attend the second meeting and then send in further comments.  The Mendocino Voice will alert readers to the date of the second meeting once that date is made known.

The document and related technical studies may be downloaded at www.albionriverbridgeproject.com and printed copies can be viewed at the following locations:

• Caltrans District 1 Office at 1656 Union Street in Eureka, CA 95501

• Mendocino Community Library at 10591 William Street, Mendocino, CA 95460

• Fort Bragg Branch of the Mendocino County Library at 499 E Laurel Street, Fort Bragg, CA 95437

In this 2014 photo, a table full of free booklets contained much more detailed and specific information about the Albion River Bridge replacement project than the current environmental documents, despite the fact those documents number more than 3000 pages. No such documents were offered this time; instead, five different bridge options are included in one massive document available at the public library, without the quality artist renderings and ease of reading the older booklets presented. (Frank Hartzell/The Mendocino Voice)

The Albion Bridge Stewards have released new information from a bridge engineer critical of Caltrans’ reports on the Albion River Bridge. UC Berkeley engineering professor emeritus Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl sent a letter on September 9 to the Stewards and Caltrans criticizing the state agency’s interpretation of its own inspection reports. That information is available on the Stewards website, along with other reports about the bridge not available from Caltrans. Astaneh-Asl has been critical of Caltrans statements and reports about the Albion River Bridge since at least 2014. He is probably best known as a critic of the disastrous San Francisco Bay Bridge replacement project, which ended up more than $6 billion over budget.

Public comments are now due by October 9. Comments may be sent via email to albionbridge@dot.ca.gov, by phone at (707) 441-5930, or via postal mail to Caltrans, Liza Walker, North Region Environmental, 1656 Union Street, Eureka, CA 95501.

The public can ask questions or request additional information about the proposed project from Katie Everett, Caltrans Project Manager, at katie.everett@dot.ca.gov or (707) 684-6998.

The post After criticism, Caltrans plans a second public meeting on Albion River Bridge replacement  appeared first on The Mendocino Voice | Mendocino County, CA.

Frank Hartzell

Frank Hartzell is a freelancer reporter and an occasional correspondent for The Mendocino Voice. He has published more than 10,000 news articles since his first job in Houston in 1986. He is the recipient of numerous awards for many years as a reporter, editor and publisher mostly and has worked at newspapers including the Appeal-Democrat, Sacramento Bee, Newark Ohio Advocate and as managing editor of the Napa Valley Register.

Related Articles

Back to top button